Tuesday, June 19, 2012

What business owners should know before going online - Spreecast




Had a great time today with my old friend Mitch Jackson on a Spreecast broadcast about the legal implications of going online.  We discussed websites, privacy, social media, protecting copyrights and avoiding copyright infringement. 

Thursday, May 31, 2012

May 2012 Newsletter

Our latest newsletter, including an article on what business owners need to do and know for the websites and changes to our firm. The Morton Memo May 2012.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Website Legal Checklist






A company’s website is a valuable asset. For Internet based companies, it is often its most valuable asset.

Business owners often are plagued by problems resulting from their websites. These problems primarily result from business owners’ lack of knowledge of the fundamental things they should have and know about their website.

With hardball trademark tactics and copyright trolls, the Internet has become an often perilous place for business owners. The following is a checklist of information that a business website owner must have.

1. The business should own the domain. Not a partner individually, someone’s spouse, etc. But, the corporation, LLC, or partnership must own the domain.

2. Possess all access information for your domain. You, personally, should have the username and password for the account that manages your domain – e.g. the GoDaddy account with which you bought your business’s domain.

3. Own all domains around your main domain. If your primary domain is xyzwidget.com, then buy xyzwidget.biz, xyzwidget.net, xyzwidget.org, xyzwidget.xxx, xyz-widget.com, xyz-widget.net, xyz-widget.org, etc. Spend some money and buy them all up

4. Use a reputable website designer. Not a friend or a relative or employee. They’ll make mistakes and break the law.

5. Have a contract with the designer. You must have a written contract with your web designer. The contract should spell out the services and the price and contain two terms:

a. The designer’s work is “work for hire”. You will own the content, not the designer.

b. All stock art, photos, content will be licensed. There should be a line item in the contract for the cost of getting licenses for stock photos. Do not allow your designer to put someone else’s pictures, art or photos on your website without a license or permission.

6. Protect your trademarks. If you do not register your trademarks, unscrupulous persons might try to take them away from you – particularly now that you are broadcasting them to the Internet.

7. Post terms and conditions of use and a privacy policy on your website. If you will be doing business on the website, you must have terms and conditions of use and a privacy policy.

8. Know your host. You need to know who is the company that is hosting your website (and probably providing you email service) and you should be in direct contract with that company.

9. Have your FTP information. You must also have the FTP (File Transfer Protocol) information and any other information that will allow you full access to the site and transfer the site to another server.

10. File your copyrights. Once your site is complete, file a copyright registration for its content.

This post is not so much informational as a checklist to be referred to by a business owner when starting a company’s website. If you need any help with any of the above items, please contact me. We have extensive experience with each of these areas.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

New Consequences for Misclassification of Independent Contractors



California has severely increased the penalties for misclassification of employees as independent contractors. All business owners who hire independent contractors need to pay attention to this change in the law.

The following is from the California State Bar's Corporation's Committee of the Business Law Section.

As of January 1, 2012, the State of California enacted legislation imposing heightened penalties on employers that misclassify employees as independent contractors. SB 459 added Sections 226.8 and 2753 to the California Labor Code. As a result, California now imposes a civil penalty ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 for each willful violation and from $10,000 to $25,000 where the employer has engaged in a “pattern or practice” of willful misclassification, in each case in addition to back pay and wages owed to misclassified workers. Under California Labor Code §226.8(a)(1), a willful misclassification is one that is “voluntary and knowing.”

In addition to the heightened monetary penalties, the new law also requires any employer found to have violated the law to place a notice on such employer’s website for one year, accessible to both employees and the general public, containing a statement that: (a) the employer has committed a serious violation of the law by willfully misclassifying employees; (b) the employer has changed its business practices to prevent future violations; (c) any employee who believes he or she is misclassified may contact the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency at the mailing address, e-mail address, or telephone number of the agency, as provided in the notice; and (d) notice is being posted pursuant to a state order.

Note also that under Section 2753, a person who, for money or other consideration, knowingly advises an employer to treat an individual as an independent contractor to avoid employee status for that individual shall be jointly and severally liable with the employer if the individual is found not to be an independent contractor. The foregoing does not apply to persons providing advice to their employers or attorneys authorized to practice law in California or another United States jurisdiction who provide legal advice in the course of the practice of law.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

December 2011 Newsletter





We just published a newsletter with articles on year end to do items, social media issues and estate planning.
December 2011 Morton Memo

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

New Services Offered

My firm has expanded. I recently brought on board attorneys Kellie M. Delaney and Michael H. Ritter. Kellie is a relatively new attorney but has a great deal of experience in civil litigation, business and corporate governance. Mike is an experienced attorney in estate planning and telecommunications.

Mike and Kellie are not only fine attorneys but are very experienced in the business world.  They bring a more practical business sensibility in their approach to our clients' issues. 

Mike and Kellie will add considerable depth to the Law Offices of Eric D. Morton. We will provide greater services in the fields of real estate, litigation, estate planning and telecommunications. In addition, we are experimenting with ways to revolutionize the practice of law through technology and close collaboration with other attorneys and professionals.

Check out our website and our new practice fields.

Estate Planning

Litigation

Real Estate

Telecommunications

As always, we are dedicated to providing our clients with responsive, quality and cost-effective legal service.   

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

True Stories: IP registrations work





In the past week, I wrote demand letters for two clients whose intellectual property rights were being violated.  We received instant and complete success in both cases.

In one instance, a former employee was using my client's copyright protected materials.  I sent the former employee a demand letter to cease and desist, to destroy all materials in her possession and send us list of all such materials and a list of all persons to whom she distributed the materials.  The former employee complied with our demands, completely, within two hours. 

In the other case, I wrote a demand letter to a company that was offering a service that was identical to my client's service and was doing so under a brand name that was so close to my client's service name that it constituted infringement.  The other company's CFO called me immediately after receiving my letter and told me that they would stop using the infringing name.

The key in both cases was registration.  In the first instance, I trained my client to register its copyrights and the client did so.  The former employee could have been sued for violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and faced enormous exposure to a court award of damages and attorneys fees.

In the second instance, my client had a Federal trademark registration for its name.  The infringing company faced great exposure to a suit for bad faith infringement.

Over the years, I have urged my clients to register their copyrights and trademarks.  Having such a registration gives a tremendous advantage to the owner of such intellectual property.  These cases show the leverage that the owner of a copyright or a trademark can have.